Prior to the start of the 2026 FIFA World Cup, the world’s first conversational debate among human participants and AI agents evaluated the field of competitors and provided early forecasts for the month-long tournament. We did this using our Thinkscape platform that enables large groups (up to 250 humans and AI agents) to hold a real-time conversation.
With Group stage of the World Cup about to end, and the performance of teams over the last two weeks providing critical insight, Unanimous AI again asked a hybrid collective intelligence made up of human fans and AI agents to consider which team was most likely to prevail throughout the knockout stages.
Rather than simply polling users or asking an AI, Thinkscape enabled a large group of 45 humans and AI agents to hold a thoughtful real-time conversation about the Knockout Stages of the World Cup and converge on a full bracket that leveraged their collective knowledge, wisdom, insight, and expertise.
To be clear – this is a real deliberation where all participants (humans and AI) argue their positions conversationally, exchanging reasoning, challenging the views of others, and ultimately converging toward a shared prediction. This is a powerful and innovative approach because AI agents don’t simply respond to questions from humans — they participate proactively in the hybrid deliberation as peers. This is another meaningful step toward true Human-AI collaboration at scale.
.


Should we Trust this Forecast?
All sports predictions have a large margin of error due to the implicit impact of chance. That said, a recently published study compared Thinkscape to large-scale prediction markets and found that groups of only 25 people engaged in hyper-connected conversations outperformed Polymarket in sports forecasts that leveraged thousands of traders.
Learn more about how Thinkscape makes teams smarter visit Thinkscape.ai.


